Bible Belt Blogger: Church that barred gay from membership changes mind

Frank Lockwood

No. Not Centenary United Methodist Church in Lexington, Kentucky. It's South Hill United Methodist Church in South Hill, Virginia.

After South Hill's pastor, Rev. Ed Johnson, refused to allow a practicing homosexual to join, he was punished (and eventually moved to another parish) by his bishop. (A judicial council later sided with Hill.) Hill's replacement allowed the gay man to join.

Press Release: Institute for Religion and Democracy

ACTIVE HOMOSEXUAL ACCEPTED INTO CHURCH MEMBERSHIP

IN CONTROVERSIAL UNITED METHODIST CASE

“United Methodism officially declares that homosexual practice, like other sex outside of marriage,

is ‘incompatible with Christian teaching.’”

-- UMAction Executive Director Mark Tooley

Washington, DC--The homosexual man who precipitated the two year national controversy over the Rev. Ed Johnson has been accepted as a member at South Hill United Methodist Church in South Hill, Virginia by Rev. Johnson’s successor. Two years ago, then pastor Ed Johnson had declined immediate church membership for the homosexual man, who was cohabitating with his same-sex partner. Bishop Charlene Kammerer intervened, demanding immediate church membership for the homosexual man. When Johnson refused, the bishop put him on unpaid administrative leave. Rev. Johnson was restored to his pulpit at South Hill in Fall 2005. But in Spring 2006, Bishop Kammerer moved him to another congregation. Rev. Johnson’s successor at South Hill accepted the homosexual man into membership this month, presumably with the full support of Bishop Kammerer.

UMAction Executive Director Mark Tooley releases the following statement:

“This complex story is not about homosexuality per se, but about the meaning of church membership. Liberal bishops and caucus groups insist that church membership is an automatic right. But traditionalists have a more nuanced understanding, believing that church members should seriously strive to live up to their membership vows.

“In October 2005, the United Methodist Church’s Judicial Council overruled Bishop Kammerer, declaring that local pastors have discretion about who is ready for church membership. The church court did not directly address the issue of church membership and homosexual practice. United Methodism officially declares that homosexual practice, like other sex outside of marriage, is ‘incompatible with Christian teaching.’ The denomination does not ordain active homosexuals and expects celibacy of unmarried clergy. But the denomination has no specific law about homosexual practice and church membership.

“Bishop Kammerer has advocated that all persons who apply for church membership must be automatically enrolled. Rev. Johnson held to a more traditional Methodist view that church members must be ready to live within church teachings. While pastor at South Hill, Rev. Johnson had welcomed the homosexual man, who sang in the church choir. But Rev. Johnson had thought more counseling was needed before church membership was appropriate.

“Despite pressures and punishments from his bishop, Rev. Johnson strove to uphold the traditional Wesleyan understanding that church membership is a special vocation, not an automatic right. The traditional understanding, with its focus on conversion, helped Methodism become America’s largest church in the 19th century. The ‘inclusivist’ understanding has fueled United Methodism’s loss of 3 million members over the last 40 years in the U.S. So who is genuinely more inclusive?”

Comments

It is truly amazing how the tide of Gay Activism is rolling through many mainstream Protestant Churches as if there were no Biblical or 3,000-4,000 year Judeo-Christian moral Tradition correctly pointing out homosexual activity is a sin. The trouble with their moral collapse ( while using flowery, political "hip" language about "rights") is that it makes it harder for those churches which are holding to the orthodox moral Tradition to hold the line. Meanwhile, according to many news accounts, Moslems-- most of whom are not buying into the West's moral decadence-- are ready, willing, and eager to fill the West's vacuum in morality and population numbers.

Posted by:deacon john m. bresnahan |March 31, 2007 at 12:52 PM